Categories
Investing

How Risky Are Stablecoins? 5 Risks To Consider

BLUF: Stablecoins are attractive for their high interest rates and greater price stability but they aren’t risk free. It’s important to understand the risks before you decide how much to invest.

I actually started writing this article 3 months ago in mid-February. I had personally been on a journey of exploring the crypto space which including building up 1% of our portfolio across Bitcoin, Ethereum and the GUSD stablecoin.

At the end of 2021 I did a classic rookie mistake of letting FOMO (fear of missing out) drive me faster into an investment that I didn’t fully understand. Buying Bitcoin and Ethereum with new investment money was an okay decision. However, at the time I also moved our entire travel fund and part of our emergency fund into GUSD – the Gemini stablecoin.

This article is going to go into the details of stablecoins, yes. But the discussion about understanding and assessing the risks is more broadly applicable to more than just stablecoins. Assessing risks and then making decisions is a lifelong practice that can have large impacts on our lives.

I’m not here trying to scare you, but rather educate you. Investing is about taking on the right amount of risk based on your goals, plan and personality. Lets get into what stablecoins are and what risks exist when investing in them.

What is a stablecoin?

They’re a cryptocurrency that’s pegged 1:1 against another asset. Most commonly this is pegged against a FIAT currency like the USD.

An example of Gemini’s Dollar (GUSD), the stablecoin that I hold, in relation to the US dollar. Because the scale is so tight it seems volatile but the price most of the time is 1.00 +/- 1 cent.

Three Main Types Of Stablecoins

There are three main types of stable coins listed in order of most to least stable.

  • Fiat-backed – stablecoins that hold reserves of the currency that it’s pegged to in order to back it.
  • Crypto-backed – stablecoins that is backed (also called collateralized) by cryptocurrencies that are held in reserved.
  • Algorithmic – These use algorithms the regulate supply and demand in order to maintain the peg. They’re usually two or more token systems where one taken is a stablecoin and the second tokens price can freely fluctuate in the market.

Here’s a list of some popular stablecoins.

Stablecoin (Symbol) – Type

  • Tether (USDT) – Fiat-backed
  • Gemini USD (GUSD) – Fiat-backed
  • Circle US Coin (USDC) – Fiat-backed
  • Dai (DAI) – Crypto-backed
  • Terra USD (UST) – Algorithmic

How Does A Stablecoin Maintain Its Peg?

In a word – trust. All the biggest stablecoins are collateralized which means that they’re back by assets. Investors buy stablecoins with the understanding that their money will be used to purchase other reliable assets like US treasuries, money market funds or short term bonds. That gives them confidence that when they want to exchange those stablecoins back to FIAT currency, they’ll be able to do it.

The algorithmic stablecoins are either partially collateralized with another crypto token or non-collateralized. In theory these work by the algorithm acting like a central bank. It holds the peg by minting more coins when there’s high buying pressure to keep the price from rising. Burns coins when there’s a lot of selling pressure to keep the price from falling.

These are quite complicated and so far have not proven to hold up during volatile situations. The most recent implosion was the token Luna which worked in conjunction with Terra UST to maintain that stablecoin. UST couldn’t maintain its peg and Luna went into a death spiral in May 2022 trying to keep the peg. It never recovered.

Terra LUNA – The token associated with UST. From $80/coin to $.00025 in less than a week. Ouch

What Is The Utility Of Stablecoin?

Being stable!

In the cryto space, price volatility is the norm. Here’s an example of price volatility for Bitcoin, the largest coin in the world. This is over a WEEK. 5-10% changes in price over a day are not unusual.

Price volatility is okay for an investment that you plan to hold, but not money where price stability is desired. Here are a few situations where stablecoins prove to be a useful tool

A Tool To Combat Unstable FIAT Currencies

In the US we take for granted that the US dollar is so stable in value. A dollar in your Friday paycheck isn’t going to change in value by the time you go to the grocery store on Sunday. This isn’t the case in other countries. Venezuela’s hyperinflation was so bad that some stores removed price labels since the price was changing daily from the currency being devalued.

https://worldpopulationreview.com/country-rankings/inflation-rate-by-country

In countries with unstable currencies, stablecoins are one way for people to move their unstable FIAT currency into something that isn’t impacted by inflation like their native currency. It’s also a way to cheaply send money to relatives in other countries.

Providing Liquidity In Crypto Markets

Provides liquidity to crypto markets. If you look at the 24 hour trading volume, stablecoins dominate the market with Tether easily number #1. That should not be surprising since it also dominates in the circulating supply with $78B Tether coins out there.

If you look at the most popular coin in marketcap and volume, Bitcoin, you can see the most popular trading pairs and their volume. Stablecoins, and more specifically Tether, are the highest volume trading pairs with Bitcoin.

The Rewards

Before getting into risks, lets acknowledge why stablecoins are getting so much attention. High interest rates! And when I say high, I mean astronomical compared to anything resembling a bank account. Here’s an example of some of the highest rates being touted.

Greed drives a lot of human behavior and it’s hard to ignore something offering such high returns compared with the < 1% that most HYSA and CD’s are offering in May of 2022. We may not know much about how they can offer such good returns but our minds can justify a lot when there’s money to be made.

And this is the allure of stablecoins. You’ve found the nirvana of investing: high returns with low risk. Or have you?

The Difficulty In Assessing Risk

I’m sorry to burst your bubble, but like most things in investing and life, there is no free lunch. There’s no such thing high returns with low risk. You see, if there was, everyone would do it and the returns would drop. What I see is the “stable” term being misinterpreted.

Stablecoins are only price stable. Price stability is being mistaken by many to mean “safe” and “low risk.”

In my world of project management, there are two components to assessing a risk: the probability of the risk occurring and the magnitude of the impact if the risk occurs. We want to avoid or mitigate risks that are both high probability and high impact.

For example, building a house in a common flood zone. There’s a high probability of the flooding happening because there’s an established history of it based on the land. If the flooding does happen there’s a high impact in that the financial cost to repair or replace the house is great. That’s why flood insurance can be very expensive if you live in a flood zone.

That’s great to understand about risk, but that only helps if you can accurately assess the probability AND impact of a risk. With a company that often comes down to the reputation of the people running it, what they tell us and the information that they publish.

Bernie Madoff was a legitimate, trusted wall street businessman for years before he started his ponzi scheme that tricked so many. Many professional investors were invested in Madoff for years without realizing it was a fraud.

Enron was formed from two legitimate energy companies that existed for decades. Then internally some bad actors started committing accounting fraud over many years imploding the company surprising many. That fraud also flew under the radar for many years despite being a public company with required quarterly accounting reports.

I’m not trying to say that stablecoins are fraudulent. I’m trying to say that it can be very hard to assess the risk of things that look like they’re working well on the outside. Some investments can very abruptly flip from the “all is well” state to losing a lot of money.

5 Risks Of Investing In Stablecoins

Given that backdrop of information on stablecoins and risk, lets talk about 5 risks that exist in the use of stablecoins.

Stablecoins Losing Their Peg

One incorrect risk assessment is perceiving a stablecoin held on a crypto exchange with a similar level of stability, safety and trust as a savings account held at a bank. After all, its stable!

However, stability is the goal, not the guarantee. We certainly saw that with the stablecoin UST (now called USTC) losing it’s $1.00 peg. It now trades for $0.02 on the dollar so you’ve lost 98% of your stablecoin investment.

As much as our brains want to think of stablecoins as cash with a set value, they’re investments. There are risks being taken behind the scenes with the money that you use to buy stablecoins in order to provide the high published interest rates.

The systems that are in place to maintain that peg are not perfect and many have never been stressed to see how hey will hold up. Algorithmic stablecoins like UST so far have proved to be the highest risk to failing. And when it happens, it’s ugly.

No Insurance Against Loss (FDIC / SIPC)

Cash held in a regulated bank gets FDIC insurance to protect a depositor for up to $250,000 in the event that the bank goes out of business. The federal government provides that backstop to avoid bank runs that happen when people lose faith in a bank and fear that they won’t be able to get their money back.

Investments held in a financial institution that is an SIPC member company are protected in the event that the company declares bankruptcy. It protects up to $500,000 in investments including up to $250,000 in cash.

Two more recent examples of this was the Lehman Brother bankruptcy in 2008 and the Madoff Ponzi scheme. Because both of these were SIPC member institutions the SIPC stepped in and was able to help protect investor accounts and try to make them whole.

Source: SIPC History
Source: SIPC History

It’s important to recognize that SIPC does NOT insure you against the loss of capital because your investments decrease in value. It’s only against bankruptcy of the member company.

At the time of writing there aren’t any crypto only exchanges that are SIPC insured. Gemini, for example, has FDIC insurance on cash it holds but no SIPC insurance. And they are one of the standout companies in the space in my opinion when it comes to being reputable and lower risk.

Counterparty Risk – The Stablecoin Company

It’s important to recognize that all these stablecoins are issued by private companies. The companies created this “currency” and for that currency to have value and exist, the company that created the stablecoin needs to be able to take those stablecoins back at any time and give you back FIAT currency in exchange.

Counterparty risk is the risk that the other party in a transaction or investment isn’t able to hold up their end of the deal. In the case of the stablecoin this could mean maintain the peg as previously discussed. It could mean that they can’t hand you back a dollar in exchange for each stablecoin that you have.

It’s easy to think of a stablecoin like any other currency. However, there’s a big difference between having the full economy of the US government standing behind the US dollar versus the having Tether Ltd. standing behind their Tether stablecoin USDT.

Tether Ltd. is a private company that has issued $72.5B (billion!) in stablecoins. That’s a lot of money and responsibility. Being an asset backed stablecoin they need to responsibly manage that money to ensure that it’s available for redemption when people want it.

Per their website this is how those reserves are held. Looks like a vast majority of it is held in very safe, secure investments like cash and US treasury bills

Commercial paper makes up a healthy percentage as well. Commercial paper is unsecured, short term debt that typically earns very little interest. 0.36% is the February 2022 interest rate for 3 month, AA rated commercial paper. If you buy up commercial paper from higher risk (lower rated) companies you’ll make a higher return but have a higher risk of default.

https://ycharts.com/indicators/3_month_aa_financial_commercial_paper_rate

However, it is important to recognize that this is all “self reported” information. There have been attestations done but no true audits. Or, as they call them “assurance opinions”. In other words, nobody has gone through and looked at all the accounts where Tether says that these reserves are held in to verify that everything is as they say it is.

I’m not saying that there’s a problem here, but the fact that they’ve never been audited and refuse to be properly audited is a red flag to me. Being that they are the #3 most valuable crypto asset in the world I sure hope that they are properly managing this reserve money.

That’s the counterparty risk that you accept with Tether. If any kind of fraud or mismanagement did occur and they couldn’t redeem your USDT for FIAT currency then the stablecoin would plummet in value.

Regulatory risk

The cryptocurrency industry is very much in it’s infancy. It has gotten so big, so quickly that it’s just starting to get more attention from governments. With so much economic money becoming intertwined with crypto, the risk goes up of a crypto collapse impacting businesses and countries goes up. Nobody wants a financial crisis like 2008 again.

In response, some governments like China have banned cryptocurrency. In the US, the SEC is looking at crypto companies much more closely and handing out fines if they aren’t complying with the rules. The SEC fined BlockFI $100M because of violations.

The point is that regulation is coming and that’s a good thing. It will help to keep peoples money safe by increasing company transparency and holding them to risk management standards. However, regulation could force some companies out of business due to fines or being unable to comply.

By chance I end up with Gemini because New York has very tough compliance rules and Coinbase was the only other option. However, in hindsight, I’m happy about that because I think the probability is lower that Gemini could do something shady and get away with it.

Hacking Risk

Police: Why do you rob banks?

Willie: Because that’s where the money is.

Willie Sutton, bank robber

One downside with the crypto space is that its really a hackers dream. No more dealing with malware and trying to extort money from people to get their data back. With crypto, there are a hundred different “banks” full of crypto from which they can steal directly.

I had someone who was able to log into my Gemini account in the middle of the night and the only thing that saved me was the I had two factor authentication turned on. Fortunately they weren’t smart enough to get around that. However, people can even spoof phones now to bypass that.

There are so many startup crypto exchanges and projects that there is money floating everywhere in cyber space. These smaller companies don’t have the budgets to secure your account like more established companies. If you crypto is stolen you’re often out of luck.

If you counter this risk by holding your assets off the exchanges in a cold wallet then there’s the risk of a seed phrase being lost and the crypto not being recoverable. This article from last year estimated that 20% of all bitcoin seems to be lost or stuck in hardware wallets.

What Am I Doing?

In February 2022 I reversed course and pulled most of that emergency fund money and all of the travel fund back out and into our HYSA. I decided that I was most comfortable with treating stablecoins as an investment and only putting what I was willing to lose in them.

I do feel more confident with my money held in Gemini. However, it’s going to take more time and some more regulation in the industry for me to be comfortable putting money that I can’t lose into them.

I keep a modest crypto portfolio of 1% of my total portfolio. Of that, it’s roughly 55% bitcoin, 25% Ethereum, 20% GUSD stablecoins.

Are Stablecoins Worth The Risk?

Like all investment decisions, that’s really up to you to decide based on your situation, risk tolerance and what you can afford to use. I think they’re an interesting investment option and can be one of the less risky options in the crypto space.

However, personally, I wouldn’t park large sums of cash that you can’t afford to lose. My opinion could certainly change over time as the industry matures but it’s still the wild wild west out there in many areas.

Like the content? Click here to subscribe to the e-mail list and have the articles delivered to your inbox.

Categories
Investing

Are Passive Mutual Funds Superior To Active?

BLUF: On average, active mutual funds largely underperform their benchmarks, have much higher fees and are less diversified than passive mutual funds. If held in a taxable account they often generate lower returns after taxes than passive mutual funds that follow the benchmarks.

Everyone wants their portfolios to do well. Many of us work a job or run a business saving and investing for the future. We hope that those investments will grow for us in the future to fund our goals be it security, retirement, legacy (prestige, inheritance or generational wealth), charitable or some combination of those.

In order for investments to grow, they need to perform. How they perform over a lifetime will have a huge impact on reaching our goals. Over the long term, just a 1% difference in the performance of your portfolio can compound to some very large differences.

Take a 30 year old that starts with zero savings. If they save $1,000 a month for 35 years and get a return of 6% per year they’ll have $1.4M at age 65.

Take the same 30 year old but this time they get a return of 7%. That 1% of additional return compounds to $1.8M or 25% more.

Due to this big return difference, people are constantly searching for the “best” place to invest their money with best usually equating to overall return performance. One important choice is whether to invest in a passive or an active mutual fund.

In this post we’ll explore what passive and active mutual funds are, the key differences between them and some things to consider when choosing. For simplicity I’m going to talk about mutual funds but the same points apply to passive and active ETFs.

If you don’t know much about mutual funds, ETF’s or index funds then I suggest you read this deep dive into the basics of each.

Passive Mutual Funds

Passive mutual funds are are seeking to replicate the performance of an index, a sector or some other benchmark. These funds aren’t trying to beat the market. The fund manager doesn’t have a choice of what to invest in. They invest in the exact securities required to replicate that index or benchmarch.

Stock index mutual funds are all considered passive mutual funds and are some of the most popular investments out there. The funds only change the stocks that they hold when the benchmark index removes or adds companies from it.

For example, if an S&P500 index kicks a company out then the mutual fund tracking that index sells all shares of the booted company and buys the shares of the company that replaces it.

A popular example of a passive mutual fund is the Vanguard VTSAX total stock market index mutual fund. You can see that its investment strategy is to track the CRSP US total market index. That’s the benchmark that VTSAX does it’s best to replicate.

Passive Mutual Fund Investment Strategy Example: Vanguards VTSAX Total Market Index Mutual Fund

Active Mutual Funds

Active mutual funds on the other hand are active because a fund manager isn’t trying to track some index benchmark. Each fund has an objective and a strategy that they are using to meet that objective.

The fund manager is actively buying and selling securities in order to meet that objective. You have a human at the helm with supporting analysts actively making decisions about what the fund should hold and when to change what it’s holding.

For example, here is the Fidelity Select Energy Portfolio mutual fund FSENX.

You can see from it’s strategy and the name that it’s trying to grow your money by investing in stock of companies in the energy sector. There is no index to follow. It’s completely up to the fund managers discretion how they choose to implement that strategy.

Passive Mutual Funds vs. Active Mutual Funds

There are a few very important areas where passive mutual funds and active mutual funds function very differently. Since these areas can impact your overall investment returns it’s important to be aware of them.

Performance: The Benchmark Vs. Trying To Beat The Benchmark

We started the article talking about performance being one of the things that investors care about most. If you want the best performance, should you buy passive funds or active?

Passive Fund Performance

In the case of passive mutual funds, they’re often serving as a benchmark to beat. They represent an entire part of the sector, market or an index and replicate the standard that active funds are trying to beat.

Here’s an example of a favorite Vanguard VTSAX total US market fund. The blue is VTSAX and the yellow is the index that it’s trying to implement and replicate.

VTSAX isn’t trying to beat any benchmark. It’s trying to replicate the benchmark. The expectation of the fund manager is that it tracks the index as closely as possible. As you can see, it does a really good job of it. It’s implementing that index (like many passive mutual funds) with a buy and hold strategy.

Active Fund Performance

Active mutual funds, on the other hand, are attempting to exceed the performance of the boring old indices or sectors. A fund manager is being paid for their individual expertise in implementing a general strategy but they have a lot more leeway as to how they want to implement the strategy.

The problem is that most active funds can’t actually beat their benchmarks. One company, SPG global, has a scorecard to measure the performance of active funds compared to their benchmarks over time.

The scorecard that they use to measure active mutual funds against their benchmarks over the last 20 years has showed a couple of distinct themes:

Actively Managed Mutual Funds Underperform Their Benchmarks

One is that actively managed funds have historically tended to underperform their benchmarks over short- and long-term periods. This has tended to hold true (with exceptions) across countries and regions.

SPG Global

In the US, 83% of actively managed large cap mutual funds underperform the S&P500 over a 10 year time horizon.

Source: https://www.spglobal.com/spdji/en/research-insights/spiva/

If you look across the board at a variety of different fund categories it’s a bloodbath. Even within the first year, way more than 62-98% of funds underperform across a range of market capitalizations.

Source: https://www.spglobal.com/spdji/en/research-insights/spiva/
Active Mutual Funds Don’t Consistently Outperform

Another recurring theme is that even when a majority of actively managed funds in a category have outperformed the benchmark over one time period, they have usually failed to outperform over multiple periods

SPG Global

The problem here is that to chase performance, successful actively managed mutual funds implement a strategy that works by picking the “hot” thing. That works while the hot thing stays hot, but it’s unlikely to stay that way over the long term. As we know, markets move in cycles and todays top performing area is usually tomorrows dog.

Want to see this in action? Here’s a list of the top performing active mutual funds available at Fidelity over the last 10 years.

What do you see? The red boxes show that most of the top performers are large cap growth associated funds since growth stocks have been crushing it. However, 2022 has been a different story as you can see in the blue box and those same funds are getting crushed now.

Cost Of Ownership

The investing world is full of sneaky ways to take your money. You rarely have to write someone a check for them to charge you fees because they already have your money. Before investing in something it’s important to understand the costs involved in buying, holding and selling that investment.

Fees

Active mutual funds often employ a variety of different investing strategies other than just buy and hold. Trading more frequently, buying investments that having higher trading expenses and buying things that aren’t even available to the average invest all have cost.

Add onto that a professional fund manager who gets paid a lot and the result is that the investment fees that you pay to own the mutual fund are much higher than a passive mutual fund.

That fee, called an expense ratio, if a percentage that you pay every year, to hold that mutual fund. Here is a passive and active mutual fund example – VTSAX with a 0.04% expense ratio.

And here is an active mutual fund example that invests in well established medium to large cap US growth stocks. It has a 0.79% expense ratio.

What are the fees on each of these investments? If you were to hold $100,000 of each of these funds, you’ll be charged the following:

VTSAX (passive example, 0.03% expense ratio)= $100,000 * 0.0003 = $30/year.

FCNTX (active example, 0.79% expense ratio) = $100,000 * 0.0079 = $790/year.

That means that if you’re looking for the best performance, that blue chip fund needs to outperform VTSAX by 0.76% each year just to break even with it. If the blue chip fund under performs, you’re still paying that 0.79%.

Turnover Rate – Impacts Taxation Potential

american dollar bills and vintage light box with inscription
Photo by Karolina Grabowska on Pexels.com

Actively managed funds tend to trade inside of them more often to meet their goals. Just like ordinary investors, those funds realize taxable gains and losses when they sell investments.

Those gains and losses are passed along to the fund holders so this metric is important if you hold a mutual fund within a taxable brokerage account. This issue doesn’t apply if you hold the funds with a tax advantaged retirement account like a 401k, 403b, TSP or IRA.

Turnover rate is a metric of how much buying and selling a fund does. The higher the number, the more buying and selling that occurs and more potential for higher expenses and also the flow down of gains and losses to you at tax time. The lower the number, the better from a potential for taxation perspective. An example below for FLGEX, a large cap growth fund.

The easiest place to see the impact of this trading on taxes is in the performance area. Here you can see the returns before and after the taxes associated with the sale of fund shares. In the 5 year column you can see that about 2% / year on average is lost to taxes.

Trading Fees

This might seem crazy in todays world of no trading fees for many stocks and bonds but you have to watch out for trading fees with mutual funds. It’s not unusual for a broker to charge a sizable fee for EACH transaction in a mutual fund that is owned by another company.

For example, here’s a blurb right on Fidelity’s website. $50-$75 PER TRANSATION for some mutual funds.

Go into one of these funds and there it is. $49.95 per transaction. That means $49.95 each time you buy the fund. $49.95 each time you sell the fund. Even if you were to buy or sell $100,000 at a time, that’s adding a 0.05% fee to every transaction.

Loads (sales charge)

One big active mutual fund cost to watch out for are funds with loads. A load is a percentage fee that the fund charges to buy into that fund. This is a sales fee where they take your money and you’re never getting it back.

Here’s an example using a particularly awful active mutual fund that you can buy through fidelity.

This fund charges you 5.75% as a sales charge when you buy it. That means that if you want to buy $100,000 of this fund that they’re going to pocket $5,750 of your money as a sales charge and give you $94,250 worth of the mutual fund.

Then, to make it more awful, there’s a deferred sales charge when you sell. That’s right, they take more money when you sell AND it’s based off of the original purchase price. It doesn’t matter if the fund has gone down. Back to our example, you purchased $100,000 so this deferred load will charge you $1,000 when you go to sell it. Even if the fund value had dropped to $30,000.

Thankfully mutual funds with loads have become far less common but they still exist. Watch out for them and in general, stay away! Stick to looking for “no load” mutual funds which don’t charge this sales fee.

Diversification

Passive mutual funds are diversified in that they own the entirety of whatever benchmark that they’re trying to replicate. You own everything in a particular sector, market, index or industry.

Active mutual funds, however, are inherently less diversified. To beat the benchmark, they’re trying to only own the biggest winners in some market segment and not buy the losers.

In practice, though, to do that can mean that the biggest performing active funds are highly concentrated in what they own. Some funds may have rules about how much of any one investment that they can own but others may not.

Lets take that Baron Partners Fund as an example. In my Fidelity search of large cap US funds that was number one in 10 year performance. It’s actually 6% higher in performance any any other fund in 10 year performance.

WOW! They must be doing something amazing. Lets look more closely at the fund starting with their strategy. Oye, they’re using leverage by borrowing up to 33% of the total value of the fund. Well, that sounds a bit risky.

What are they buying with that borrowed money? Holy crap. They own a total of 32 investments with 54% of the fund holding Tesla stock! Did I mention that this fund has a 1.36% expense ratio so you’re paying a nice fee to hold a fund that’s heavily concentrated in Tesla.

This might be an outlier but it’s just one example of how actively managed funds can do some pretty extreme things to outperform. If Tesla tanks this fund will crash. If it tanks badly enough it could get margin called and blow up.

Are Passive Mutual Funds Superior To Active Mutual Funds?

Based on the data presented I sure think so. On average, active mutual funds largely underperform their benchmarks, have much higher fees and are less diversified than passive mutual funds. If held in a taxable account an active fund is going to generate more taxes making it even harder to compete on an after tax basis.

The odds of an actively managed mutual fund beating its benchmark over 10 years is very low, let alone over a 20, 30, 40 or 50 year investors lifetime. The odds of you then picking one of those unicorn funds AND that fund being open to a retail investor are low. What is for certain is that you’re going to pay higher fees, will be less diversified and will have greater tax liability in a brokerage account.

Is it possible for an active mutual fund to outperform, net of fees, after taxes, over the long term? Highly unlikely. Even iconic funds like Fidelities Magellan fund has underperformed over very long time horizons. Here is a comparison between that fund and the S&P500 from 1994 to 2022.

What Do We Invest In?

We’re 100% invested in passive mutual funds and ETFs with a vast majority of it in a three fund portfolio: Total US stock market, total international stock market ex-US, total US bond market. Here’s an example from my Roth IRA.

I try and stay open minded to the possibility that there could be a place for an active fund as a part of our portfolio in the future but I haven’t found a compelling reason yet.

Do you invest in any actively managed mutual funds? If so, which ones and why? Comment down below.

Like the content? Click here to subscribe to the e-mail list and have the articles delivered to your inbox.

Pinterest
fb-share-icon